nad vs marantz
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases made on our website. If you make a purchase through links from this website, we may get a small share of the sale from Amazon and other affiliate programs. You can read our complete affiliate disclosure/TOS for more details.

NAD and Marantz are both old names when it comes to audio device engineering. If you are looking for a powerful AV receiver or integrated amplifier, you may be considering NAD or Marantz. However, which should you choose? Which brand produces better amps and other audio devices? In this article, we explore NAD vs Marantz.

Here is a short comparison if you don’t wish to read everything:

NAD amplifiers tend to outperform Marantz amplifiers of similar specifications and prices. However, Marantz amplifiers offer better resolution, bass and mid-range sound quality. Marantz also offers better built-quality and better warranty.

It is also best to demo your amplifiers before deciding to buy.

Before we do that, here are some other comparisons in this series:

Marantz vs Yamaha
Marantz vs Anthem
Marantz vs Denon

NAD Vs Marantz Comparison Table

FeaturesNADMarantz
Sound QualityThey produce a nice sound that takes into account the price.
NAD amps sound really good especially if you want to hear a lot of detail, clarity.
Marantz shows up as a “warmer” sound with better sound accuracy and quality.
Bass PerformanceClean, tight powerful bass extortion.More power handling capabilities.
Frequency ResponseNarrow frequency response range.Wider frequency response range.
Pricing Affordable pricingMarginally expensive
EfficiencyEfficient sounding systems.Super-efficient, high-performance.
Power and AmplificationLow power demand and high amplification efficiency.Low power demand.
MusicMellow music – jazz, rockWarmer music – jazz, rock, classical
MoviesAction, romanceComedy, thriller

NAD Vs Marantz Overview

NAD Overview

NAD has been in the market since 1972. Many of their new technology in the NAD’s Masters Series innovations are finished with an advanced design.

nad audio logo

Besides, they sound better than the boutique brands that can cost more than NAD. The Masters Series was created to prove that high fidelity audio, high technology, and high design should not come at a fortune.

nad integrated amplifier

The DirectDigital amplifier in the Masters Series is one of the most advanced closed-loop digital amplification with the ability to compare its output to the input and make corrections every 10 nanoseconds.

This results in pure and vivid sound quality. The other technology is HybridDigital which masterfully blends analog and digital technology to create a platform that beats every traditional component, even with analog sources.

NAD products enjoy noble design features engineered by award-winning industrial designer, David Farrage of DF-ID in New York. The Master Series is a high-fidelity product with software-defined switches and readouts that allow real-time updates.

Marantz Overview

The company was started by Saul Marantz in 1953. Over the years, Marantz receivers have evolved from the ‘Consolette” pre-amp of 1953 to the modern receivers produced by Denon and Marantz under Sound United.

marantz logo

From the first audio device – Consolette pre-amp, Marantz produced Model 1 preamplifier, then Model 2 mono power amplifier, Model 3, and Model 7 preamplifier. The company focused on improving the models.

marantz integrated amplifier

Model 8B came with an added 5Wpc power increase from a circuit base, and Model 9 became the very first Marantz preamplifier with a front panel and 70W output. At Model 10, Marantz added an FM radio and Philips bought the company in the 70s. 

However, in 2000, Marantz Japan Inc. united all the subsidiaries. In 2013, Marantz produced the SR Series Home Theater Receiver with improved sound quality, Hyper Dynamic Amplifier Module, and AirPlay connectivity. 

It is therefore an old name when it comes to the manufacture and marketing of audio devices. 

Sound Quality

NAD Sound Quality

NAD is one of the all-time great buys in audio land. In general, they offer warm sound that is non-fatiguing and they do not emphasize the top end.

NAD amps sound really good especially if you want to hear a lot of detail, clarity and good bass. Some people however find them quite harsh.

Power amplifiers are the strength of NAD. It is however difficult to say how a particular speaker will sound with a particular amp. Simply put, NAD sounds warmer.

Marantz Sound Quality

When dealing with higher price points, Marantz shows up as a “warmer” sound. Many people also add that Marantz provides better sound accuracy and quality.

Also, Marantz receivers from the 1970s epitomize the pinnacle of the solid-state hi-fi era. For instance, Marantz 2245 hits a real sweet spot in terms of power and price.

NAD Sound Harshness and Fatigue

NAD amplifiers sound smooth and linear. The sound is generally mellow, crisp clear, and fantastic. They sound controlled, without being too bright.

Besides, they got plenty of soul for music and the home theater is very impressive.  

Marantz Sound Harshness and Fatigue

Marantz generally produces a less detailed sound than NAD. They sound a bit bright, but with all the “detail.” Fatigue can however creep in if you are using bright recordings.

Bass Performance

For the purpose of bass performance, we shall review NAD T758 Vs. Marantz SR 7011. These subwoofers offer splendid bass performance regardless of the music you are listening to.

If you need more power handling capabilities, go with Marantz. However, if your interest is in clean, tight powerful bass extortion, NAD wins the league.

NAD T758 Surround Sound Receiver

This receiver features popular surround sound formats such as DTS:X, HD formats Dolby Atmos, and DTS Master Audio. Also, the receiver offers a simple and flexible user interface.

Pros

  • Extremely easy to set up.
  • Multi-channel.
  • Built-in BluOS wireless streaming technology.

Cons

  • The regular interface and BluOS technology are old-school.

Marantz SR6015

The Marantz SR6015 is a 9.2 Channel 8K AV Receiver with 3D Audio, HEOS built-in and voice control. It also offers 110W per channel (8 Ohm, 20Hz-20kHz, THD: 0.08%, 2ch drive).

Te sound is rich, full, and powerful. Besides, the receiver delivers a very healthy power outpuht.

Pros

  • Excellent room calibration fine-tunes the sound quality.
  • The solid design makes it both functional and attractive.
  • Versatile, with good connections and features.
  • 2 channels.

Cons

  • Poor remote configuration.
  • Needs active cooling

Frequency Response

NAD Frequency Response

NAD speakers have a narrow frequency response range. For instance, the NAD 802 speaker with a bass reflex output and delivers perfect midrange.

The crossover frequency of the speaker amounts to about 2 kHz, while the reflex tuning frequency is 65 Hz and the tuner section receiving range is 87.50 MHz – 108.00 MHz.

Marantz Frequency Response

Marantz is generally produced with a wider range of frequency responses. Major products range from 10 Hz to 20 kHz. The audio section of the SR6014 for instance is 10 Hz – 100 kHz. Tuner however has a similar reception frequency range of 87.5 MHz – 108.0 MHz.

Pricing

NAD Speaker Prices

NAD is considered a high-end audio company that sells a lot of high-end amplifiers among other audio devices.

The prices are however much favorable and affordable with regards to the quality and most of their receivers under $1000 cannot find competitors in the market even at higher prices. 

Marantz Speaker Prices

Marantz has earned a reputation for innovation, consistent manufacturing, and production of high-quality products. Going spec by spec, the Marantz receivers are priced marginally higher than NAD.

Efficiency

NAD amps sound really ok especially if you need a lot of detail, clarity, and even nice bass response. This makes them quite efficient.

Marantz employs the Digital Audio Amplifier Technology that majorly features four channels of high-efficiency, low-distortion digital audio amplification. Some users describe them as super-efficient, high-performance audio devices.

Power And Amplification

NAD Power Requirements

NAD speakers are not so power-hungry. They deliver huge bass values at lower power rates and will not kill your amps. The amplification efficiency is very high with low power demands.

Marantz Power Requirements

Marantz speakers are generally not power-hungry. However, depending on the category of speakers you choose, and if you listen to music at high volumes, the speakers will demand more power.

NAD Vs Marantz For Music And Movies

NAD Speakers For Music and movies

A sound test with NAD C368 confirms that NAD is a perfect sounding amp that provides a rich, impulsive, and immersive experience to give you beautiful and clear sound effects and music.

Besides, the sound effects work hard to reproduce the actual intentions of the movie effects making you the real conqueror of the movie theater.

Marantz Speakers For Music and Movies

Marantz has a good musical reputation based on the many years of developing products for audio support.

No matter if you are a jazz aficionado, a real rock, and roller, or a lover of classical tunes, Marantz is the better choice. You will feel immersed in the deep sound of the various instruments being played on the stereo, whether you are on your favorite song or movie.  

Design And Build Quality

NAD amplifiers do not really grab much attention on their design. Customers who care more about design won’t really like the modest, understated exteriors. The interior build is however superb with futuristic provisions that allow expansion such as MDC.

Marantz Design and Build Quality

Marantz receivers are generally stylish, offering a luxurious feel with illuminated displays. The build is perfect.

For instance, you can find 11 speaker terminals on Marantz SR7015, with the gold-plated RCA terminals that make it look even more appealing.

The design is simply topnotch with top-of-the-line parts infused throughout the chassis. Marantz’s designs will surely get your first impression.

Impedance

Speaker impedance is very important when you are considering a receiver. In general, NAD is better for speakers that are harder to drive. They are most rated for 4 ohms, while Marantz is typically rated for 8 ohm speakers

The Importance Of Audio Audition

Choosing the best receiver or speaker in a market full of vintage and modern players may not be so easy. For example, many people will tell you the Marantz 2270 is still a good choice today. Check out our Marantz 2270 receiver review to learn more. As far as vintage is concerned, keep in mind that many Marantz amps have a phono input which could be a plus if you ever need to play vinyl.

That is why we recommend you conduct your own audio audition when choosing audio equipment until you land your best match. You will find one of your best speakers or receivers from NAD or Marantz, just listen to both first.

Marantz SR 7015 Vs. NAD T 778

The NAD T 778 is the latest high-performance AV receiver from NAD and continues the MDC philosophy. The 9-channel AV Receiver features NAD’s Hybrid Digital Amplifier Technology to deliver the claimed performance of 140 watts FTC power at 8 ohms and 170 watts at 4 ohms, and will run up to a 7.2.2 system.

Besides, there is processing onboard for 11.2 channels by using pre-outs plus an additional2-channel amp that allows you to move to 7.2.4 for Dolby Atmos.

For audio, you get superb musicality for stereo playback, Dirac Live, Dolby Atmos, and DTS:X decoding.

The design is however very subjective but will appeal to many AV enthusiasts. Also, control is made easier with the large TFT touchscreen in the center of the front plate and large remote control.

Pros

  • Superb sound quality with stereo and multi-channel
  • Excellent design
  • Future-proofing with MDC

Cons

  • Only one 4K HDMI output
  • Very expensive

Marantz SR 7015

Equipped with performance amplification, this receiver features high-current 9-channel distinct amplifiers.

The power output is 125 watts per channel when 2 channels are in use. Some of the innovative features include HDAM circuitry, the latest HDMI technology, razor-sharp motion clarity, ALLM, and more.

The overall impression is optimal fidelity and excellent sound quality with high operational stability.

Pros

  • Stunning audio performance
  • Admirable build quality
  • High operational flexibility

Cons

  • No Front Wide Channel Support
  • No MHL Input

NAD C316 BEE Vs. Marantz PM5005

Based on our rating, C316BEE has a total of 5.2 out of 10 Vs. 6 out of 10 for PM5005. Here are the advantages of Marantz PM5005 over NAD C316BEE:

  • Has speaker A and B switch
  • Better signal to noise ratio: 103dB Vs. 95dB
  • Supports 8 ohms and 4ohms Vs. 8 ohms only
  • Better THD in stereo: 0.01% vs 0.02%

Other common strengths of Marantz PM5005 include:

  • Balance control
  • Treble control
  • Bass control\moving magnet phono stage

NAD C326 BEE Vs. Marantz PM6006

NAD C326 BEE

  • 50 watts per channel when operating 2 channels
  • 7 RCA audio inputs
  • 4 ohms stable for use with a wide range of speakers

Marantz PM6006

  • 45 watts per channel when operating 2 channels
  • Optical and coaxial digital audio inputs
  • Built-in DAC
  • 5 RCA audio inputs, including a phono input for turntable
  • Current feedback amplification and toroidal power transformer for clean, accurate sound

NAD T758 V2 Vs. V3

NAD T758 V3 is an eminent upgrade of NAD T758 V2 that has been done endowed with bleeding-edge room correction and audio streaming capabilities. Let’s look at the plus and minuses in this upgrade at a glance.

Plus

  • Modularity allows upgrades
  • Dirac room correction
  • BluOS audio streaming
  • Atmos 7.1.4 is capable of external amplification

Minus

  • Only 3 HDMI inputs
  • No DTS:X

Conclusion

Marantz seems to win with resolution and mid-range brilliance. However, in real tests, NAD always outperforms Marantz as the better all-rounder.